| Normal
Project |
Concurrently
Engineered Project |
| All data
must be complete at tool release before entire tool can
be planned and processed. |
Because
data is released in segments, we're able process
information immediately upon availability. |
| Completed design passed to
shop before work can begin. |
When this data is processed
in stages, the mold is then designed and developed in
concurrent stages. |
| Few
processes can be begun including materials acquisition. |
There is
more emphasis on data exchange and efficient
communications with customer to enable processes to
become more segmented and be acted upon more quickly. |
| Focus of tool build is
broader in scope and design dependent. |
Focus is on stage to be
completed with incremental information. |
| Problem
resolution is assumed to be taken care of during design
stage, therefore, additional problems can slow or stop
progress. |
Planning
is more flexible and allows problem resolution on the
fly. |
| Setup Planning happens upon
receipt of design. |
Because programming is based
on timing with material receipts, there is no opportunity
for a time-saving staged approach. Information critical
planning, programming based on geometry receipt. Job may
'stop' if there is a delay in data exchange. |
| Because a
complete set of tool drawings for mold are needed prior
to beginning project, there's little opportunity to save
on meeting time and design costs. |
With
excellent communications, design costs are lower due to
less or no need for 2D prints up front. |
| Because tool build costs are
based on past tool projects, there is increased
opportunity for changes to incur additional fees. |
Managing total costs for
tools not previously processed in this manner is more
efficient if communications methods and project
management are utilized. |